<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambigrams Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uwmike.com/articles/2007/09/21/ambigrams-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uwmike.com/articles/2007/09/21/ambigrams-again/</link>
	<description>Hacker, Engineer, Dancer, Gentleman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Purvis</title>
		<link>http://uwmike.com/articles/2007/09/21/ambigrams-again/comment-page-1/#comment-21602</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Purvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uwmike.com/articles/2007/09/21/ambigrams-again/#comment-21602</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that it&#039;s ambiguous is generally a Bad Thing, but part of the art of ambigram design (the part that I get the least) is cloaking uncertainties using tricks in the surrounding letters... if the overall script has forward flags on lettertops, then you&#039;re more likely to accept one on a letter that doesn&#039;t ordinarily have it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that it&#8217;s ambiguous is generally a Bad Thing, but part of the art of ambigram design (the part that I get the least) is cloaking uncertainties using tricks in the surrounding letters&#8230; if the overall script has forward flags on lettertops, then you&#8217;re more likely to accept one on a letter that doesn&#8217;t ordinarily have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://uwmike.com/articles/2007/09/21/ambigrams-again/comment-page-1/#comment-21586</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uwmike.com/articles/2007/09/21/ambigrams-again/#comment-21586</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That letter you singled out looked a lot more like a &quot;t&quot; before I read you asking if it looked like an &quot;f&quot;. Now it looks like both/either.
I think I want pattern recognition skills!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That letter you singled out looked a lot more like a &#8220;t&#8221; before I read you asking if it looked like an &#8220;f&#8221;. Now it looks like both/either.<br />
I think I want pattern recognition skills!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- uwMike.com will return...-->

